The Current Resolution
2017 September/October Topic Area: Korean Peninsula • Resolved: Deployment of anti-missile systems is in South Korea’s best interest.
Past Public Forum topics:
Resolved: In East Africa, the United States federal government should prioritize its counterterrorism efforts over its humanitarian assistance.
How best can the U.S. government best deal with security and humanitarian challenges in East African countries? … Peruvian economist Hernando de Soto… argues that the legal exclusion of most Africans from formal rule of law institutions restricts their options for engaging in world markets. DeSoto argues that online one-third of the world’s population has access to the rule of law, and that elites of the world tend not to be bothered by that.
April Public Forum
“Resolved: The United States ought to replace the Electoral College with a direct national popular vote.”
March Public Forum
“Resolved: The United States should no longer pressure Israel to work toward a two-state solution.”
The stories from Startup Rising paint an optimistic future for the Middle East. Israel already enjoys a dynamic tech sector, and now capital and expertise are surging into nearby Arab countries.
For the Public Forum U.S./Israel two-state topic, residents of the Palestinian territories currently lack an option to consent to their governance. Without consent, how can governance of the Palestinian territories be legitimate? From the U.S. Declaration of Independence:
Nation-states can be more trouble than they’re worth. For the Middle East, federalism, soft-partition, enclaves, and charter cities offer non-state paths to peace and prosperity.
Public Forum Debate – 2017 Feb Topic Area: Cuba
Resolved: The United States should lift its embargo against Cuba.
Ending the Cuba trade embargo would shift sugar production back to Cuba and away from ecologically fragile lands in the U.S. “Protect the Everglades, not sugar farmers,” (Florida Sun Sentinel, Feb 16, 2017) argues
“Balseros (Cuban Rafters) [is] much grander humanist statements because they give a particularly human face to the horror of two separate Cuban refugee debacles.”
For decades the Cuban government has claimed the U.S. trade embargo is the cause of Cuba’s poverty. Economists agree the embargo blocked trade that would have allowed both Cubans and Americans to prosper.
In an April 19, 1971 press conference, President Nixon said:
“If the want to trade … we are ready,” he said. “If they want to have Chinese come to the United States, we are ready. We are also ready for Americans to go there, Americans in all walks of life.
Chinese could visit America and Americans could visit China. Why weren’t similar doors opened for travel between Cuba and the U.S.?
By the time of the Cuban revolution United States had a long history of “engagement” with Cuba. The U.S. military occupied Cuba from 1989 to 1902 and again from 1906 to 1909 and again from 1917 to 1922. U.S. firms controlled much of Cuban sugar and other industries.
Cuba’s political and economic history is complicated, and U.S. interventions in Cuba, as in many other countries, led to unexpected and unwanted consequences. [Full post here.]
[a combined China policy/ Public Forum Cuba embargo post]
In Mexico, China, and Cuba, labor rates are far lower than in the United States. And not just labor rates, but rules about how many hours a day or a week employees can work, and what benefits employers are required to pay.
NSDA debaters have a US/China engagement topic, and the February Public Forum topic is: Resolved: The United States should lift its embargo against Cuba.
The last days of the Obama Administration ended the long-standing wet-foot/dry-foot policy for Cubans (see below), and the Trump Administration wants to build a bigger wall along the Mexican border, renegotiate trade agreements between the US and Mexico (NAFTA), and also with China. The stated goal is to restore jobs lost as companies automated and shifted manufacturing operations to Mexico and China.
Lifting the trade embargo with Cuba would open doors to similar job displacements as US firms open new factories and upgrade agriculture in Cuba. Cubans are very poor after a half-century of communist rule, so Cuban demand for goods produced in the US will be minimal. [Full post here.]
More Debate Central Resources
Have questions about how to construct a case? We’re happy to provide free case critiques and advice!
Just getting started? Excellent! Check out our section entitled ‘Learn‘ to get started.
Resources from Older Topics
NSDA Nationals 2016: Presidential Primary Process
“Resolved: On balance, a one-day national primary would be more beneficial for the United States than our current presidential primary process.”
March 2016: Okinawa Military Presence
Resolved: The United States should withdraw its military presence from Okinawa.
February 2016: Carbon Tax
Resolved: The United States federal government should adopt a carbon tax.
January 2016: Russia Economic Sanctions
Resolved: On balance, economic sanctions are reducing the threat Russia poses to Western interests.
November 2015: Refugee Crisis
Resolved: In response to the current crisis, a government should prioritize the humanitarian needs of refugees over its national interests.
September/October 2015: Reparations for African Americans
Resolved: The United States Federal Government ought to pay reparations to African Americans
NSDA Nationals 2015: 1st Amendment & Anonymous Speech
Resolved: The benefits of First Amendment protection of anonymous speech outweigh the harms.
April 2015: Ground Troops Against ISIS
Resolved: Committing United States ground combat troops to fight ISIL is in the best interest of the United States.
March 2015: Free Community College Education
Resolved: In the United States, students should be guaranteed two years of free tuition to a community or technical college.
November 2014: GMO Foods
Resolved: On balance, the benefits of genetically modified foods outweigh the harms.
Pro Topic Guide
Nationals 2014: NATO deterrence against Russian aggression in Ukraine
April 2014: Economic development vs. environmental protection in India
March 2014: Single-gender classrooms
February 2014: Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act
January 2014: Sahel region of Africa
December 2013: Immigration reform
November 2013: NSA surveillance
September 2013: Non-Proliferation
April 2013: Drug Policy
March 2013: Health Care
February 2013: China Rise
January 2013: Citizens United
December 2012: Fiscal Cliff
November 2012: Middle East
October 2012: Climate
September 2012: Assault Weapons Ban
March 2012: Aid to Pakistan.
February 2012: Birthright citizenship.
January 2012: College costs.
December 2011: Income inequality.
November 2011: Electoral College.