nuclear power

 

Many of you are still searching for the perfect affirmative case to run on this year’s 2014-2015 policy debate topic, Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase its non-military exploration and/or development of the Earth’s oceans. Today, we’re going to help you get prepped by sharing our FULL affirmative file for our nuclear power aff case. Download it now!

 

The file comes complete with a fully formatted 1AC, plus 2AC extensions and topicality frontlines. Click the link below to get it:

 

Nuclear Power Aff

 

Stay tuned, because we’ll be posting videos featuring advice on running this case, including some fun strategic tricks!

 

Want even more free evidence? Sign up for a Debate Central workshop and receive brand new files created just for you by our experts. And don’t forget to follow us on Twitter and Facebook for daily links to useful evidence.

 

What file would you like to see next? Tell us in the comments, and we’ll get to work for you!

 

9 Comments

  1. alec says:

    what format is this in as i can not get the aff in a readable format

    • Rachel Stevens says:

      Hi Alec, the file is formatted as a Word document, so that it will remain editable in case you want to change anything. If you don’t have Microsoft Office on your computer, you may want to download one of the open source programs available that can open .doc files. Or, you can email me at Rachel (dot) Stevens (at) ncpa.org, and I will send you a PDF copy. I hope that helps!

  2. Andy says:

    I have word and am also not able to get this file in a readable format.

    • Rachel Stevens says:

      Hi Andy, please send Rachel [dot] stevens [at] ncpa.org an email and I will try to send it to you directly. Anyone else having problems is welcome to do the same thing :)

    • jo says:

      Would you please send a readable format to me, as well?
      Do you have a negative LD case on the UIL topic of threatening speech that you would be willing to share? Thanks!

      • Rachel Stevens says:

        Absolutely, I will send it. We do not currently have a case written for the UIL topic, but I would like to produce one at some point. I will send it to you if that becomes possible.

  3. Masami Watanabe says:

    I really*5 appreciate your work. I’m from Japan and we’re researching on this topic. I come to understand an observation in the US and it’s a really eye-opening thing for me. Thank you so much.

  4. rebbeca says:

    Spot on with this write-up, I honestly feel this amazing site needs a great deal more attention. I’ll
    probably be returning to read through more, thanks for the advice!

Leave a Reply to Rachel Stevens

Acces Our Research

Health Care Policy
Tax Policy
Retirement Policy
Environment Policy

Learn More

About Us
Meet Our Experts
Meet Our Staff
Contact Us

Join the Conversation

Health Policy Blog
Economic Policy Blog
Retirement & Taxes Blog
Energy & Environment Blog

Get Involved

Attend
Subscribe
Sponsor
Donate

Follow Us

RSS
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

YouTube
Flickr
Helium


Copyright © 2011 National Center for Policy Analysis. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Sitemap